Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pav Akhtar (2nd nomination)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. → Call me Hahc21 21:37, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
- Pav Akhtar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article was tagged in May 2007 as lacking a credible claim of notability, and was listed for Deletion in September 2007. The result of that discussion was no consensus to delete. The article describes a non-notable person who has had involvement only as an elected political at a London borough level, this fails to meet any of the relevant notability criteria WP:GNG and WP:POLITICIAN. In terms of sources a number of links are dead, and I would suggest that this article fails to establish the notability of the person in question. Wisden17 15:24, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 15:30, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete Overly self-promotional with no real significance. He has a job, he's a local councillor and he's been on TV isn't enough. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 15:43, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
- delete I don't see that Akhtar has contributed to any one realm in a significant way. Certainly not politics. This reads like a cover letter. --PDX er1 (talk) 19:06, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete -- A union official (other than the most senior) is NN; so is a lcoal councillor; The only basis on which he might be notable is as a gay activist, for which he has some awards, though probably NN ones only. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:10, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Obscure NN politician. Szzuk (talk) 20:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.